xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re[2]: XFS

To: Торощин Сергей Геннадьевич <root@xxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re[2]: XFS
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 10:55:56 -0500
In-reply-to: <799615985.20040603123938@xxxxxx>
Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs
References: <219426257.20040602150824@xxxxxx> <20040602142044.GU22280@xxxxxxx> <1086197503.32683.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <799615985.20040603123938@xxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
There is no formal 1.3.3 yet, that's why it's -pre2.  I don't expect it
to change though, unless you guys find horrible bugs.

It's a long story as to why xfs-modules is in it's own RPM, essentially
these packages come from another SGI product, and it's simple to just
release these GPL parts as-is on oss.sgi.com.

-Eric

On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 01:39, tORO]IN sERGEJ gENNADXEWI^ wrote:

> Was it build from 1.3.3 stable version? bcz i see "-pre2"
> And why you make xfs modules separately from kernel? if its nota
> secret of cause =))
-- 
Eric Sandeen      [C]XFS for Linux   http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.          651-683-3102


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • XFS, Торощин Сергей Геннадьевич