| To: | Linux-XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Hard Drive Cache Size and XFS Performance |
| From: | Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:51:39 +0800 |
| Mail-followup-to: | Linux-XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i |
Hi everyone, Please pardon this very basic question. For single-hard-drive IDE systems with write cache disabled, how significantly does a hard drive's cache size affect the performance of XFS, all other factors being equal? We're evaluating hard drives and are comparing two identical Seagate 7200RPM drives, the only differences between them being the cache size (2MB vs 8MB) and price. Does XFS benefit from a modern hard drive's use of its internal cache read-ahead only (since write caching is disabled)? Thank you very much. :) --> Jijo -- Federico Sevilla III : jijo.free.net.ph : When we speak of free software GNU/Linux Specialist : GnuPG 0x93B746BE : we refer to freedom, not price. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | XFS + LVM Root fs questions, Kai Leibrandt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Hard Drive Cache Size and XFS Performance, Michael Loftis |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS + LVM Root fs questions, Kai Leibrandt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Hard Drive Cache Size and XFS Performance, Michael Loftis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |