| To: | Craig Tierney <ctierney@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE 895751 - unwritten extent buffer fix |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:31:16 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1087273393.2901.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| References: | <200406150155.i5F1t4DM69795530@snort.melbourne.sgi.com> <1087273393.2901.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 10:23:13PM -0600, Craig Tierney wrote: > > So is this patch the same/similar to the patch that Manasori > Tsuda worked up, or is was the problem solved differently > (related to differences in xfs_inode and inode)? > Sorry, should've made it clear. This fix is for a completely different problem, unrelated to the data corruption issue. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] deadlocks on ENOSPC, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs_dump problem, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TAKE 895751 - unwritten extent buffer fix, Craig Tierney |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE 913919 - remove MAC, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |