| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Evms-devel] XFS + evms + x86_64 + network hangs... |
| From: | Hendrik Visage <hvisage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:16:26 +0200 |
| Cc: | Jan De Landtsheer <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hendrik Visage <hvisage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jord Tanner <jord@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, evms-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040602081013.GB32633@frodo> |
| References: | <40BB48A3.1050205@indygecko.com> <20040601083234.GB4347@hvs.envisage.co.za> <20040601193038.A999249@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <1086085280.19799.45.camel@Jan-DEV.dct.be> <20040602081013.GB32633@frodo> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 06:10:13PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > still help me greatly. The common theme from the two folks > who sent me info is use of rsync, and thats what I was using > when I hit it too.. but subsequent runs on exactly the same > data and devices has proved unsuccessful at reproducing. I'll > keep plugging away. I've found that when I do "ethernet" rsyncs, I use a different data set (huge directories like the SuSE 9.1 DVDs), as I copy part, it hangs, copy another part, it hangs etc. perhaps something that needs growing or a directory that needs a bigger allocation? hendrik |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Evms-devel] XFS + evms + x86_64 + network hangs..., Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Evms-devel] XFS + evms + x86_64 + network hangs..., Jan De Landtsheer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Evms-devel] XFS + evms + x86_64 + network hangs..., Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Evms-devel] XFS + evms + x86_64 + network hangs..., Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |