| To: | Phy Prabab <phyprabab@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: limitation of inode count on x86 (32b) |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 24 May 2004 11:17:38 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040523225013.51141.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from phyprabab@xxxxxxxxx on Sun, May 23, 2004 at 03:50:13PM -0700 |
| References: | <20040523225013.51141.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 03:50:13PM -0700, Phy Prabab wrote: > Sirs, > > Do I understand correctly that XFS on x86 is limited > to 2^32 inodes? I am looking at making a fairly large > XFS file server where there will probably be millions > up millions of sym-links. Want to make sure I > properly size the server. > > Thank you for your time. All Linux filesystems are "limited" that way. The size of the inode number in the VFS is 32 bits on i386. See __kernel_ino_t, ino_t, and all the places where "unsigned long" is used directly, eg. the "struct inode" i_ino definition in linux/fs.h. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE 907752 - fix acl(5) typo, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: limitation of inode count on x86 (32b), Phy Prabab |
| Previous by Thread: | limitation of inode count on x86 (32b), Phy Prabab |
| Next by Thread: | Re: limitation of inode count on x86 (32b), Phy Prabab |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |