xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Speeding up XFS

from [lawalsh] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Speeding up XFS
From: lawalsh <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 14:42:18 -0700
Cc: Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040516183348.GA9622@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040426165155.GA19148@xxxxx> <200404261726.i3QHQ8Aj298772@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040505151243.V3275@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40A50A58.8030705@xxxxxxxxx> <20040516183348.GA9622@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502)
Attaching traces for 64 (fail), 128(fail), 256(fail).  32 and 16 work as
documented on the man page.  Maybe it's a new security feature.  xfs checks
user's man page and enforces language in man page?  :-)
Also included are the 32 and 16 and no size specified (should be same as
32).  tar'ed and feathered....


Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 11:05:12AM -0700, lawalsh wrote:

  
Haven't tried 64 and 128 yet, but 256 made ugly ascii error messages
on my screen (generic mount failed message).
    

strace mount please and show the error code it gets from the kernel.


  --cw

Attachment: results.tbz2
Description: Binary data

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Speeding up XFS, Chris Wedgwood
Next by Date:  [Bug 328] freeze on XFS recovery on sparc64 with linux kernel 2.4.26, bugzilla-daemon
Previous by Thread:  Re: Speeding up XFS, Chris Wedgwood
Next by Thread:  Questions about pagebuf code, Craig Tierney
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]