| To: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 1/1] Update laptop mode control script with XFS_HZ=100 |
| From: | Bart Samwel <bart@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 May 2004 10:08:27 +0200 |
| Cc: | nathans@xxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040512010453.196fc8c9.akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <E1BNdCk-0008BN-TJ@xxxxxxxxx> <20040511154057.6d6c193b.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20040512090006.B362314@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40A1D7E3.8020700@xxxxxxxxx> <20040512010453.196fc8c9.akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 |
Andrew Morton wrote: Bart Samwel <bart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:>>aargh. XFS is broken. It shouldn't be exposing jiffy-based tunables into >>/proc, or `mount -o remount' or whatever. >> >>It would be much better to rework XFS so that these user-visible tunables >>are in units of milliseconds, centiseconds or whatever.They're in USER_HZ since 2.6.6. Andrew, is that OK or should they really be in some even more fixed unit?All architectures have USER_HZ=100. But it's a bit nicer and future-proof to relabel it as centiseconds. Agreed. Nathan, I'll make a patch for this. --Bart |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 1/1] Update laptop mode control script with XFS_HZ=100, Andrew Morton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 904196 - Merge up to 2.6.6, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch 1/1] Update laptop mode control script with XFS_HZ=100, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch 1/1] Update laptop mode control script with XFS_HZ=100, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |