| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Unsupported sector size |
| From: | Johann Lombardi <johann.lombardi@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 7 May 2004 18:17:44 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040507134230.C237809@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405051202070.29190-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200405062127.02535.johann.lombardi@xxxxxxx> <20040507134230.C237809@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | johann.lombardi@xxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.5.4 |
> 16k blocksize? What type of machine have you got there? (i.e. > do you know what the kernels pagesize is? - you cannot use a > blocksize larger than your pagesize on Linux). IA64 smp and the pagesize is 16k. > OK, this is busted. It looks like quite an old mkfs bug, but > my memorys cloudy going back so far - I suspect this is a bug > that was fixed early-2002: > > xfsprogs-2.0.6 (30 May 2002) > - ... > - Fix the way mkfs.xfs round downs the device when the last > AG is smaller than the minimum AG size. > - ... > > What does mkfs.xfs -V say for you? OK, you are right. My xfsprog are really old (2.0.3). I have finally decided to upgrade this package (for 2.5.6) and it solves the problem. I didn't know that my xfsprogs was so old. Thanks for your help. Johann |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Unsupported sector size, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 914236 -, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Unsupported sector size, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | PARTIAL TAKE 913919 - remove some dead code, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |