| To: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Questions about pagebuf code |
| From: | Craig Tierney <ctierney@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 04 May 2004 21:49:22 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1083702549.4107.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1083435856.2302.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040501194709.A23768@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1083446482.2302.22.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1083614597.24397.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1083698993.2376.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1083702549.4107.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > > > The codes might not be the same, but if it is a race condition > > there still might be something similar there. > The problem still exists I just don't have a clue at to where > the race might be. The doublewrite README indicated that corruption does not happen when a uni-processor kernel is used. I tried that with my code and I still got corruption. Your test is a bit better (smaller, runs locally). I can help try and track down that problem. It might fix my problem. It might also indicate something else pathological that would be related to my problem. Craig |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: typo in XFS_IOC_GETXFLAGS?, Herbert Poetzl |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 913531 - recovery of v2 logs of log record size of 256K will fail on Linux, FSG QA |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Questions about pagebuf code, Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Questions about pagebuf code, Craig Tierney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |