| To: | Herbert Poetzl <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: typo in XFS_IOC_GETXFLAGS? |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 5 May 2004 10:04:17 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040504105629.GA1531@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, May 04, 2004 at 12:56:30PM +0200 |
| References: | <20040503215840.GA26617@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040504085546.B127559@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040503230042.GA27312@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040504123233.D149002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040504105629.GA1531@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
Hi Herbert, On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 12:56:30PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 12:32:34PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > > > > Actually, it turns out that both of these are fine (thought > > I tested this!) because the XFS_XFLAG and XFS_DIFLAG values > > well, never said that it wouldn't work ;) Heh. > PS: is there some documentation about the XFS > quota code, I'd like to extend the quota system > by allowing more than one quota hash for each > filesystem (vfsmount) Not really. The code has a fairly liberal sprinkling of comments though, thats probably your best bet. Can you elaborate a bit more on what you mean by one quota hash for each fs? (separate dquot hash tables per-fs?) Is that based on observed performance problems, or to provide some alternate functionality...? cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Questions about pagebuf code, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 311] ioctl hang in 2.6.x kernels with quota support, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: typo in XFS_IOC_GETXFLAGS?, Herbert Poetzl |
| Next by Thread: | Re: typo in XFS_IOC_GETXFLAGS?, Herbert Poetzl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |