| To: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Questions about pagebuf code |
| From: | Craig Tierney <ctierney@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 04 May 2004 13:29:53 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1083614597.24397.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1083435856.2302.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040501194709.A23768@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1083446482.2302.22.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1083614597.24397.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 14:03, Russell Cattelan wrote: > Look at this bug and see if matches you're situation. > http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198 I ran doublewrite on my server. I bumped up the threads to 20 and was easy able to generate a problem. I wrote a script that submitted 1 doublewrite process to each of 20 nodes, to more mimic what I am doing. I ran these for 6 hours and did not have a problem. It could be that my jobs are putting more of a load on the system, or the problem isn't the same. However, since the doublewrite test passes on a uni-processor kernel, I am rebuilding my kernel and will rerun my test to see if it works or not. The codes might not be the same, but if it is a race condition there still might be something similar there. Craig |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE 913934 - fix direct user memory dereference in bulkstat, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Questions about pagebuf code, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Questions about pagebuf code, Craig Tierney |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Questions about pagebuf code, Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |