xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Speeding up XFS

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Speeding up XFS
From: Glen Overby <overby@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:56:43 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: lists-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: message from Bruce Guenter sent 26 April 2004
References: <20040426165155.GA19148@xxxxx> <200404261726.i3QHQ8Aj298772@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040426173300.GA23256@xxxxx>
Reply-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On April 26, Bruce Guenter wrote:
> >    There is an ugly hack
> >    we put in to kee inode numbers < 2**32.  This changes inode and
> >    data placement (inodes are kept in the lower AGs, user data is
> >    spread around in the upper AGs) and brings on the full-filesystem
> >    case earlier.  I think thats what you hit.
> 
> Is there any way to avoid this situation?

On Irix: mount -o inode64

On Linux: rewrite linux to use 64 bit inode numbers :-)

With your filesystem, you should not be hitting the 32 bit inode
problem.  It kicks in a bit above a terabyte.

I recently did some test runs similar to yours and found that a
2048-byte filesystem and directory block size was fastest.  I believe
that was largely bounded by log writes.  This was on some obsolete
hardware: 180mhz SGI O200 + SGI TP9100 4+1 RAID (internal log) so your
mileage will likely vary.

Glen Overby


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>