xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mount problem 2.6.5 kernel

To: lawalsh <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mount problem 2.6.5 kernel
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 07:14:03 +1000
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4086DFF9.9080807@xxxxxxxxx>; from xfs@xxxxxxxxx on Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 01:56:25PM -0700
References: <4086DFF9.9080807@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 01:56:25PM -0700, lawalsh wrote:
> I recently bought large disk (250Gb, previous largest was 150, all
> 1 xfs partition mk'ed with default params).  mk'd this one with
> -i size=2048 and -b size=8192, got output:
> ...
> a factor;  oops....seems to be xfs specific bug.

Blocksize cannot be larger than pagesize - the kernel is right
to fail this mount request.

> Hmmm....I thought linux page size was 8K (?).  Shouldn't 8K block size also
> work? 

Page size depends on your architecture - for i386, its 4k.

> If that is the problem, any idea when xfs will be able to use block 
> sizes > page size?

Not any time soon.  AFAIK no Linux filesystems have implemented
this -- there are assumptions scattered throughout the generic
Linux file IO / page cache code that the blocksize will not be
larger than the page size.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>