xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Bug 324] New: oops with xfs_fsr on 2.6.5-1.326

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Bug 324] New: oops with xfs_fsr on 2.6.5-1.326
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:43:53 -0500
Cc: Matteo Centonza <matteo@xxxxxx>, Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-master@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1082560958.15446.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404210956220.17402-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1082560958.15446.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 04:08, Matteo Centonza wrote:
> 
> 
>>i haven't my laptop handy but seems not the case since RH backed it out 
>>starting from 2.6.5-1.309.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>-m
> 
> 
> it seems to be in as of 1.332....
> 
> -Eric
> 

The problem here is that we are not just talking about xfs stack usage,
we are talking about the complete I/O stack in some cases. So if you are
using a combination of XFS, LVM, and some driver which is stack hungry,
then all bets are off without lots of work - and not just in XFS.

I have actually been running Linus's tree with 4K stacks on my XFS only
laptop for a week or so without problems. I build kernels, I use
bitkeeper etc. Probably the fact that I am just using a simple ide
drive is the saving grace here.

Steve


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>