On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 13:00, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> > The XFS code in the above dirs reflects the state of the tree from
> > roughly January, with bugfixes merged in along the way. It is the same
> > XFS codebase as is being finalized for commercial SGI linux products.
>
> So this implies that the XFS codebase that's in the current 2.4/2.6
> kernels is newer? Meaning that if we roll our own kernels we can assume
> we've got the latest XFS code pretty much all the time, right?
Yes.
CVS is newest (well, within an hour)
kernel.org is (usually) not too far behind
Things like this release have been through a month(s)-long release
process, and are older, but should be well-tested and stabilized.
-Eric
--
Eric Sandeen [C]XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. 651-683-3102
|