| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Announce: xfs 1.3.3 beta 1 |
| From: | "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:00:58 -0700 |
| In-reply-to: | <1082135324.25946.17.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Back To Basics Network Management |
| References: | <1082135324.25946.17.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) |
Eric Sandeen wrote: > The XFS code in the above dirs reflects the state of the tree from > roughly January, with bugfixes merged in along the way. It is the same > XFS codebase as is being finalized for commercial SGI linux products. So this implies that the XFS codebase that's in the current 2.4/2.6 kernels is newer? Meaning that if we roll our own kernels we can assume we've got the latest XFS code pretty much all the time, right? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Announce: xfs 1.3.3 beta 1, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Announce: xfs 1.3.3 beta 1, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Announce: xfs 1.3.3 beta 1, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Announce: xfs 1.3.3 beta 1, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |