| To: | Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: file corruption |
| From: | Leroy van Logchem <leroy.vanlogchem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 02 Apr 2004 13:23:18 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040402092857.GJ21226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20040402001801.GA24900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <406CB95B.4040500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040402011618.GA25511@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <406CC518.1090204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040402015022.GA25936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <406CCF08.9020309@xxxxxxxxxxx> <406CD88F.3070900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040402044712.GB27240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <406D0AE4.2030203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040402085308.GB28623@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040402092857.GJ21226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040123 |
Ethan Benson wrote: >On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 12:53:08AM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > > >>>Thanks for clarification, though! :) At least now I know _why_ XFS >>>shouldn't be used on a production server :) >>> >>> >>You're most welcome. Best of luck with reiserfs. >> >> >if your worried about data corruption/loss, reiserfs is the last fs >you want to run to... > > > Just use UFS2 on FreeBSD and be happy ever after. No corruption no loss just production quality. Been there.... never to return again. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | synctest results on xfs/ext3(htree) on 2.6.5-rc3-mm4, Yusuf Goolamabbas |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.25 XFS can't create files, Carsten Gaebler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: file corruption, Ethan Benson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: file corruption, Stephen C. Tweedie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |