| To: | Bart Samwel <bart@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 1/2] Laptop mode support for XFS |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:55:56 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1080899086.5032.346.camel@xxxxxxxxx>; from bart@xxxxxxxxx on Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:44:47AM +0200 |
| References: | <E1B9KzA-00083v-Is@xxxxxxxxx> <20040402103333.A787@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1080899086.5032.346.camel@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:44:47AM +0200, Bart Samwel wrote: > The maximums that are listed for the regular flush_interval and > age_buffer are way too low for laptop mode usage. I've considered > increasing the maximums, but I figured they would be that low for a > reason. By doing it this way, the maximums for regular usage aren't > affected. If everybody thinks it's OK to simply increase the maximums on > the regular ones to INT_MAX (or at least something like HZ*7200), I'll > _gladly_ do that instead. There's no real problem with large intervals (except the possible data loss on a crash), so I'd say enlarge them. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 1/2] Laptop mode support for XFS, Bart Samwel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | synctest results on xfs/ext3(htree) on 2.6.5-rc3-mm4, Yusuf Goolamabbas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch 1/2] Laptop mode support for XFS, Bart Samwel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch 1/2] Laptop mode support for XFS, Bart Samwel |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |