| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: file corruption |
| From: | Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Apr 2004 00:28:57 -0900 |
| In-reply-to: | <20040402085308.GB28623@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-copies-to: | nobody |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20040402001801.GA24900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <406CB95B.4040500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040402011618.GA25511@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <406CC518.1090204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040402015022.GA25936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <406CCF08.9020309@xxxxxxxxxxx> <406CD88F.3070900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040402044712.GB27240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <406D0AE4.2030203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040402085308.GB28623@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 12:53:08AM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > > Thanks for clarification, though! :) At least now I know _why_ XFS > > shouldn't be used on a production server :) > > You're most welcome. Best of luck with reiserfs. if your worried about data corruption/loss, reiserfs is the last fs you want to run to... -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkBtMlkACgkQJKx7GixEevxURACdFxKuB94XHCd9ZcSTEeJBUJhS V/8AniqZHjdnsspKA4s7xDYgYZSbMCS8 =im2A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: file corruption, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [patch 1/2] Laptop mode support for XFS, bart |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: file corruption, Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: file corruption, Leroy van Logchem |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |