xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Speeding up XFS

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Speeding up XFS
From: Bruce Guenter <lists-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:09:04 -0600
In-reply-to: <408D5A7F.1050108@xfs.org>
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20040426165155.GA19148@em.ca> <408D5A7F.1050108@xfs.org>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 01:52:47PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> The very wierd part is the slowdown you see with an external journal
> in the last case. I can see no reason why an external vs an internal
> journal would be different except for the possibility that there
> is some form of interaction with queue unplugging in the elevators
> between devices. It might be worth trying Linus's latest bitkeeper
> tree (2.6.6-rc2) which has per device queue unplugging and see
> if that makes a difference.

I have re-run the benchmarks using the 2.6.6-rc2-mm2 kernel.  The
slowdowns still happen, but they aren't as severe.

> I attached a perl script. If you run this once a second and capture the
> output when things are going bad it might tell us a few things.

I saved the output to a directory, one file per second.  It is available
at http://untroubled.org/benchmarking/2004-04/xfs_stats.tar.bz2  The
worse slowdowns (200ms average time to list+read+unlink the contents of
a directory) occurred between 14:04:07 and 14:19:12.
-- 
Bruce Guenter <bruceg@xxxxx> http://em.ca/~bruceg/ http://untroubled.org/
OpenPGP key: 699980E8 / D0B7 C8DD 365D A395 29DA  2E2A E96F B2DC 6999 80E8

Attachment: pgpSa1MzZMnSq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>