xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: getxattr over NFS returns EIO instead of EOPNOTSUPP

To: acl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: getxattr over NFS returns EIO instead of EOPNOTSUPP
From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:50:41 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Bent.Terp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040329164324.A14946@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: acl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx, Bent.Terp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20040329134759.GA8624@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20040329164324.A14946@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: acl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx, Bent.Terp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 04:43:24PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 03:47:59PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > please have a look at the following bug report:
> > http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=73
> > 
> > getxattr returns I/O error when the NFS server is not serving
> > EA/ACLs. Previous kernels return "not supported". The difference are
> > XFS 1.3.0 patches and the nfs-acl patches.
> 
> I don't see how this is XFS-related.  fs/xattr.c is in mainline now
> and always returned EOPNOTSUPP if xattrs are not implemented in the
> actual filesystem.  My guess is that the nfs-acl patches have some
> bugs, what about asking Andreas?
OK, moving the thread over to acl-devel. I assume the XFS patches and
the nfs-acl patches are not doing well, at least on the Fedora Core
patched kernel. That's why I tried at linux-xfs list first.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAampBQBVS1GOamfERAlfSAJ9fn4DD9VWRnzUkTpCYy23MaYdJNwCeNwMv
LqQ/4vm2ZLIFOLIFb88ENTs=
=SXWj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>