xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: >1 TB RAID servers

To: "Steve Lord" <lord@xxxxxxx>, <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: >1 TB RAID servers
From: "Rivera, Angel R" <Angel.R.Rivera@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:49:44 -0600
Cc: <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Joshua Baker-LePain" <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>, "Daryl Herzmann" <akrherz@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcQSsnjA14QyntsdQVOS+lM6G173fAAhmW1w
Thread-topic: >1 TB RAID servers

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Steve Lord
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 3:44 PM
To: christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Joshua Baker-LePain; Daryl Herzmann;
linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: >1 TB RAID servers

[snip]

Not sure which are supposed to be safe, all you can do is ask around
as to what hardware/software folks are successfully using with 2.4
for filesystems greater than 1Tbyte.

As you can see from Christoph's answer, 2.6 with the large block
device option is the preferred option.

ARR> We have some 50TB in 1.4TB chucks and they are very stable.
With the large block patch you can get them over 2TB with the 2.4
kernel. We are testing the 2.6 kernel because of read-starvation
issues.





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>