xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PARTIAL TAKE 910631 -

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: PARTIAL TAKE 910631 -
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 23 Mar 2004 11:56:27 -0600
In-reply-to: <200403231742.i2NHg94I028007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs
References: <200403231742.i2NHg94I028007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
I should mention that this was submitted by Chris Wedgwood, and was also
similarly suggested by Utz Lehmann.  Thanks guys!

On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 11:42, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Change fsr routines so that they don't copy data unless
> the extent count has improved.  This should speed things
> up a bit.
> 
> Date:  Tue Mar 23 09:43:02 PST 2004
> Workarea:  penguin.americas.sgi.com:/src/eric/xfs-cmds
> Inspected by:  cwf
> 
> The following file(s) were checked into:
>   bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/xfs-cmds
> 
> 
> Modid:  xfs-cmds:slinx:168942a
> xfsdump/VERSION - 1.59
>       - Bump version
> 
> xfsdump/doc/CHANGES - 1.66
>       - Doc fsr changes
> 
> xfsdump/fsr/xfs_fsr.c - 1.16
>       - Change fsr routines so that they don't copy data unless
>         the extent count has improved.  This should speed things
>         up a bit.
-- 
Eric Sandeen      [C]XFS for Linux   http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.          651-683-3102


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>