xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Bug 319] New: wishlist: allow shrinking of XFS

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Bug 319] New: wishlist: allow shrinking of XFS
From: Iustin Pop <iusty@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:28:51 +0200
Cc: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-master@xxxxxxxxxxx, brian@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <405F465A.7020104@xxxxxxx>
References: <200403210050.i2L0oseZ003869@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20040321035738.GB4143@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040322194923.GA5404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <405F465A.7020104@xxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 02:02:34PM -0600, Steve Lord wrote:
> Its a little more complex than that, when you grow, you add empty space to
> the fs, when you shrink, you have to move files out of the space being
> removed.
> 
> [.......]
> 
> Not quite just the reverse of adding more free space ;-)
> 
> Steve
> 

Ahem, yes, uh, I imagined the space would be empty (magically). I'll
make one more try, however: based on the model of xfs_fsr, couldn't the
files (not the dirs) be moved in other AGs? This of course would leave
the directories and maybe the inodes in the to-be-freed AGs. Just a
mental exercise :)

Thanks for the nice explanation.


Iustin Pop


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>