xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mkfs under different kernels

To: Feizhou <feizhou@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mkfs under different kernels
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Mar 2004 10:31:44 -0600
Cc: XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <404F2546.90904@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs
References: <404F1F68.30700@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <404F2546.90904@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
mkfs does query the kernel for device size, stripe info, etc.
So if 2.4 returns a different answer than 2.6, that's the only
difference I can see that might matter.

But the short answer is that it should not make a difference.

You can do a quick test; if the mkfs.xfs output does not change, then
there is no difference.

-Eric

On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 08:25, Feizhou wrote:
> Feizhou wrote:
> > Is there any difference between running mkfs.xfs under a 2.4 kernel and 
> > running that under a 2.6 kernel?
> > 
> > Any benefits doing it under 2.6?
> > 
> > 
> 
> Let me add some context. I am going to conduct some benchmarks between 
> xfs and ext3 under different configurations and I wondered if running 
> mkfs under different kernels would affect the results.
-- 
Eric Sandeen      [C]XFS for Linux   http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.          651-683-3102


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>