xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

TAKE 910624 - fsync tuning

from [Nathan Scott] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: sgi.bugs.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: TAKE 910624 - fsync tuning
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 15:00:31 +1100 (EST)
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
Remove dup fdatasync/fdatawait call on fsync.

Means we no longer take the iolock here, and hence readers no longer
conflict with concurrent fsync activity.  Kudos to Steve!


Date:  Thu Mar  4 19:58:57 PST 2004
Workarea:  snort.melbourne.sgi.com:/home/nathans/xfs-linux
Inspected by:  lord@xxxxxxx,felixb@xxxxxxx

The following file(s) were checked into:
  bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/xfs-kern/xfs-linux


Modid:  xfs-linux:xfs-kern:167949a
xfs_vnodeops.c - 1.621
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • TAKE 910624 - fsync tuning, Nathan Scott <=
Previous by Date:  TAKE 910702 - deadlock fix, Nathan Scott
Next by Date:  TAKE 907752 - xfs_io, Nathan Scott
Previous by Thread:  TAKE 910702 - deadlock fix, Nathan Scott
Next by Thread:  TAKE 907752 - xfs_io, Nathan Scott
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]