Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 03:39:26AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> A lot of this is actually optional features the other FS don't have,
> like support for separate realtime volumes and compat code for old 
> revisions, journaled quotas etc. I think you could
> relatively easily do a "mini xfs" that would be a lot smaller. 

And a whole lot of code to stay somewhat in sync with other codebases..