xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3

To: David Weinehall <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: 03 Mar 2004 03:39:26 +0100
Cc: Dax Kelson <dax@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Nelson <pnelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hans Reiser <reiser@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ext2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040303014115.GP19111@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4044119D.6050502@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4044366B.3000405@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4044B787.7080301@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1078266793.8582.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040302224758.GK19111@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40453538.8050103@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040303014115.GP19111@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
David Weinehall <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:30:32PM -0500, Andrew Ho wrote:
> > XFS is the best filesystem.
> 
> Well it'd better be, it's 10 times the size of ext3, 5 times the size of
> ReiserFS and 3.5 times the size of JFS.

I think your ext3 numbers are off, most likely you didn't include JBD. 

> And people say size doesn't matter.

A lot of this is actually optional features the other FS don't have,
like support for separate realtime volumes and compat code for old 
revisions, journaled quotas etc. I think you could
relatively easily do a "mini xfs" that would be a lot smaller. 

But on today's machines it's not really an issue anymore.

-Andi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>