| To: | Feizhou <feizhou@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Performance problem with xfs |
| From: | Feizhou <feizhou@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 02 Mar 2004 17:30:20 +0800 |
| Cc: | Danny Cox <danscox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <40403DC6.7070501@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <403F1934.3020701@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1077894047.25678.7.camel@pip> <40403DC6.7070501@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040208) |
Unfortunately I did not have the time to pin down what improved things butupgrading the processor and pulling out 1G RAM from the installed 2G RAM improved performance and stability of the box. also a tweak to /proc/sys/vm/kswapd was made.kswapd doesn't even show up as using cpu anymore now and I don't have blocked processes anymore. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3, Hans Reiser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3, Peter Nelson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3, Hans Reiser |
| Next by Thread: | XFS and Redhat Linux, Eric Jordan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |