RE: >1 TB RAID servers

["Rivera, Angel R" <Angel.R.Rivera@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We found these problems as well, but were able to resolve
them by taking a look at the number of inodes.

Here is a looksie into our current test box

Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1             9.7G  6.6G  2.6G  73% /
none                 1012M     0 1012M   0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda2             2.9G   86M  2.7G   4% /tmp
/dev/md0              2.8T   11G  2.8T   1% /ptmp/hoepld69

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Austin Gonyou
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 3:45 PM
To: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Christian Guggenberger; Steve Lord; Joshua Baker-LePain; Daryl
Herzmann; XFS List
Subject: Re: >1 TB RAID servers


We still use that old 2.4.19 stuff on volumes that are 1.5T max. Going
to about 1.7T we notice issues for sure, mainly in the properly reported
size. it might show up as 300M, or 1T. 1.5 is the max we've been able to
get away with and not have issues of that nature.