| To: | "Robin Rosenberg" <robin.rosenberg.lists@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Felipe Alfaro Solana" <felipe_alfaro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3 |
| From: | "Mike Gigante" <mg@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:24:10 +1100 |
| Cc: | "David Weinehall" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andrew Ho" <andrewho@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dax Kelson" <dax@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Peter Nelson" <pnelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Hans Reiser" <reiser@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ext2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx>, <jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <200403031059.26483.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wednesday 03 March 2004 10:43, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > But XFS easily breaks down due to media defects. Once ago I used XFS, > but I lost all data on one of my volumes due to a bad block on my hard > disk. XFS was unable to recover from the error, and the XFS recovery > tools were unable to deal with the error. A single bad-block rendered the entire filesystem non-recoverable for XFS? Sounds difficult to believe since there is redundancy such as multiple copies of the superblock etc. I can believe you lost *some* data, but "lost all my data"??? -- I believe that you'd have to had had *considerably* more than "a bad block" :-) Mike |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3, Felipe Alfaro Solana |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3, Felipe Alfaro Solana |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3, Clemens Schwaighofer |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3, Felipe Alfaro Solana |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |