xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS on large block device problem

To: Frank Hellmann <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS on large block device problem
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 26 Feb 2004 15:15:53 -0600
Cc: XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <403E33DA.2070509@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs
References: <403E33DA.2070509@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
If you are able to re-mkfs the filesystem, can you try a mkfs
immediately followed by a repair, to see if the mkfs worked properly? 
I've been talking to someone else on 2.6.3 + xfs + lbd + md where mkfs
wasn't even able to get bits down to the disk properly.  This is just
userspace; if we can't do writes and have md put them in the right
place, we're in trouble.  stracing mkfs, I see pwrites of superblocks to
locations that never seem to make it to disk...  I'm tempted to blame
md, but I need to try to recreate here.

Anyway, can you try mkfs.xfs; xfs_repair?

-Eric

On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 11:58, Frank Hellmann wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I just upgraded one of our linux boxes (Redhat 9 + usual 2.6 and glibc 
> patches) to kernel 2.6.3 and wanted to try out the large block device 
> support. First attemp, beware... :-)
> 
> I setup a md0 device consisting of four ~1.5TB large devices with mkraid 
> /dev/md0 and a simple /etc/raidtab.
> 
> I had some issues makeing the filesystem on /dev/md0. mkfs.xfs 
> complained about a non-clean md0 device and would not let me do anything 
> with it.
> 
> Upgrading to xfs-progs 2.6.3 and mdadm 1.5 tools didn't change that.
> 
> First doing an mkfs.ext3, mounting and unmounting the device seems to 
> cure that. At least after that I could mkfs.xfs it.
> 
> Unfortunatly restoring (tar not xfsrestore) some demo data back onto the 
> drive I was getting a lot of xfs/kernel messages into the logfile. The 
> tar process stopped with errors after about 200M of restore and the last 
> files got corrupted. pdflush has high activity (~95%).
> 
> xfs_repair reports beside a lot of other problems a couple of:
> 
> primary/secondary superblock XX conflict - AG superblock geometry info
> conflicts with filesystem geometry
> 
> which really makes me wonder, whats going on... See the attached files 
> for further info. Unfortunatly I currently don't have any debugging 
> tools on that machine...
> 
> Everything is peachy (with LBD), if I stay below the usual 2TB limits 
> with the 2.6.3 kernel.
> 
> Am I missing anything for XFS LBD support? Any ideas?
> 
> 
>               Cheers,
>                       Frank...
-- 
Eric Sandeen      [C]XFS for Linux   http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.          651-683-3102


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>