| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: large allocation groups fix |
| From: | Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2004 02:07:59 -0900 |
| In-reply-to: | <20040224110011.35273.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-copies-to: | nobody |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402231015130.25148-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040224110011.35273.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:00:11AM +0000, Alexander Fisher wrote: > You said that one of my workarounds would be to > downgrade xfstools (or at least mkfs.xfs). Wouldn't > it be better if the latest released version of > xfstools worked correctly with the latest released > version of xfs? Perhaps its possible for mkfs.xfs to the latest version of XFS is in Linux 2.4.25 > detect the use of xfs1.3.1 (and earlier?) and not > create large allocation groups under those conditions. such runtime checks are really not appropriate for a mkfs IMO. you can force current mkfs to not create large AGs. read the man page. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: large allocation groups fix, Alexander Fisher |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | FS, CPU or memory problem?, Dan Yocum |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: large allocation groups fix, Alexander Fisher |
| Next by Thread: | Re: large allocation groups fix, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |