| To: | Dan Hollis <goemon@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: All your XFS are belong to SCO |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Feb 2004 23:03:36 +0000 |
| Cc: | linux xfs ml <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402181454160.3083-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from goemon@xxxxxxxxx on Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 02:58:34PM -0800 |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402181454160.3083-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
> What is SGI's position on this? I think this the wrong list to ask. If you want some form of answer your best bet is to ask an executive, but even then I wouldn't want to guarantee for anything :) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | All your XFS are belong to SCO, Dan Hollis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: All your XFS are belong to SCO, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | All your XFS are belong to SCO, Dan Hollis |
| Next by Thread: | Re: All your XFS are belong to SCO, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |