[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Performance question

To: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Performance question
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 18 Feb 2004 15:59:50 -0600
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, Linux xfs mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402181554550.25541@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402181131210.25541@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040219071800.F244261@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1077137507.14414.18.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402181554550.25541@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 15:04, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:

> /data/vcc/vccMuscles_testfiles/:
>         0: [0..7]: 1417836144..1417836151
>         1: [8..15]: 1417835896..1417835903
> I feel like I should clarify that those 3.3M files are spread out in a 
> deeply branching tree of subdirectories under 
> /data/vcc/vccMuscles_testfiles.  There are ~29K total, and they go several 
> levels deep.

If any one of those has a huge number of inodes in a single dir, that'd
be the one we're interested in.


Eric Sandeen      [C]XFS for Linux   http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.          651-683-3102

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>