| To: | Joshua Schmidlkofer <menion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_repair -n -f - Dangerous? |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 Feb 2004 07:08:21 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1077131478.4214.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from menion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:11:18AM -0800 |
| References: | <1077131478.4214.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:11:18AM -0800, Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote: > I see that running xfs_db is dangerous. I have a system that I ran > xfs_repair (-n -f) on a live filesystem, and it was a Bad Thing(tm). Is > that the case? not a lot was going on, but I got some really nice call yes, xfs_repair will have the same problem as xfs_db. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfsdump -, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Performance question, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_repair -n -f - Dangerous?, Seth Mos |
| Next by Thread: | xfsdump -, Joshua Schmidlkofer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |