| To: | Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>, Linux xfs mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Performance question |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:03:18 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <4.3.2.7.2.20040218193615.035c24c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402181131210.25541@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 19:41 18-2-2004 +0100, Seth Mos wrote: At 12:57 18-2-2004 -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:Perhaps creating the filessystem with a larger inode size like 512. You could also use version logs instead of version which mostly helped software raid 5 although this might help hardware as well. Version 2 logs that is. Cheers -- Seth I don't make sense, I don't pretend to either. Questions? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Performance question, Christian Guggenberger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | xfs_repair -n -f - Dangerous?, Joshua Schmidlkofer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Performance question, Christian Guggenberger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Performance question, Joshua Baker-LePain |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |