| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS problem with 2.6.2-rc2 |
| From: | "Jeffrey E. Hundstad" <jeffrey.hundstad@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 06 Feb 2004 00:15:48 -0600 |
| Cc: | Ingo Juergensmann <ij@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402052356510.28526-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402052356510.28526-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 |
Keep in mind my recent personal experience. I tested my memory with
memtest86 for two days with the extended option and found no errors. I
compiled the kernel and found a SIG-11 that happens at different places
every compile. ...I switched the memory and the compiles and memtest86
both worked successfully. ...in other words... it could really still be
memory.
-- jeffrey hundstad Eric Sandeen wrote: On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:memtest86 run a whole night as well with no reported error. So, this is supposed to be a bug within the userland tools, namely xfs_repair. Allocating 2 GB of memory is not very, uhm, modest... ;) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS problem with 2.6.2-rc2, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Corrupt File - Maybe, Vernon A. Fort |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS problem with 2.6.2-rc2, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS problem with 2.6.2-rc2, Ingo Juergensmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |