xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read()

To: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.2-rc2 nfsd+xfs spins in i_size_read()
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:33:12 +0000
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040205123037.GW3166@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from miquels@xxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 01:30:37PM +0100
References: <bv8qr7$m2v$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040129063009.GD2474@frodo> <bv8qr7$m2v$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040128222521.75a7d74f.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20040129063009.GD2474@frodo> <20040129232033.GA10541@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040204000315.A12127@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <401FAC70.8070104@xxxxxxx> <20040204181709.A21093@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040205123037.GW3166@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 01:30:37PM +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> On 2004.02.04 19:17, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Here's a new diff, that should get rid of all the warnings except for
> > O_DIRECT.  I've also addressed the comments from Dave and Steve.
> 
> This patch appears to work fine, but mkdir() still warns about i_size_write() 
> :

Well, this one is harmless as the i_size write is on the newly created inode
which isn't on the hash yet.

Andrew, do you plan to keep the debugging check?  If yes I could cludge
around it, but I'd prefer not to.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>