xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: df and "Value too large for defined data type"

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: df and "Value too large for defined data type"
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:19:14 +0000
Cc: James Pearson <james-p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1077904776.7024.5.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com>; from sandeen@sgi.com on Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 11:59:36AM -0600
References: <403DF97D.C717302E@moving-picture.com> <1077904776.7024.5.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 11:59:36AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> the 2.4 statfs interface is 32 bits; I think that until you upgrade the
> server to 2.6, and (as Christoph tells me) you'll also need a very
> recent glibc to take advantage of it.
> 
> On a large filesystem, xfs easily wraps around the ints in the statfs
> structure.

Well, in the case of free inodes we might be a bit over-eager and should
just return some random lower value.  Not that it really matters with
dynamically allocated inodes..


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>