xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: TAKE 909639 - XFS log recovery for v2 >32K (64K) LRs on log wrap tri

from [Chris Wedgwood] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE 909639 - XFS log recovery for v2 >32K (64K) LRs on log wrap trips assert
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 04:16:50 -0800
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200402200708.i1K78NSd019670@sherman.melbourne.sgi.com>
References: <200402200708.i1K78NSd019670@sherman.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 06:08:23PM +1100, Tim Shimmin wrote:

> Fix log recovery case when have v2 log with size >32K and we have a
> Log Record wrapping around the physical log end. Need to reset the
> pb size back to what we were using and NOT just 32K.

Does this mean v2 logs are 'mostly' safe right now?


   --cw
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: DMAPI test suite., Ram Pai
Next by Date:  Re: DMAPI test suite., Steve Lord
Previous by Thread:  TAKE 909639 - XFS log recovery for v2 >32K (64K) LRs on log wrap trips assert, Tim Shimmin
Next by Thread:  Re: TAKE 909639 - XFS log recovery for v2 >32K (64K) LRs on log wrap trips assert, Seth Mos
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]