I sent that email 5 days ago, it sat on a server for 5 days before
moving on. Argh. But yes, I see all the spam that got through
yesterday. A disaster. I assume spamd died again, but this is getting
to be a problem. An open list with a few spams a week is manageable,
the flurry yesterday is an embarrassment. We'll discuss it.
-Eric
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 15:58, Darrell Michaud wrote:
> It wasn't just yesterday. Not to revive a dead horse but I received over
> 30 spam mails from the XFS list in the last 24 hours.
>
> Something needs to be done if this list is going to remain useful to a
> wide audience.
>
> Before someone flames me to be unsubscribe if I don't like it, I am a
> step ahead of you.
>
> Take care.
>
>
>
> On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 18:28, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 17:16, Arthur Corliss wrote:
> >
> > > > You are free to unsubscribe.
> > >
> > > Yes, I am. But until someone from SGI tells me that they refuse to fix
> > > the
> > > list config, I'm going to stay and hope it gets fixed. I want to get the
> > > legitimate e-mails, I just don't want the spam. And I really don't think
> > > I'm
> > > being unreasonable for expecting that much.
> >
> > We do not plan to change our previous conscious decision to keep the
> > list open. It's not broken, it's intentional. I'm sorry you don't like
> > it. It's not your choice. staying subscribed, or not, is your choice.
> >
> > spamd died for a while, some spam got through, deal with it. If you
> > can't deal with it, please -do- unsubscribe. This thread has had higher
> > volume, and not much more useful content, then the small bit of spam
> > that leaked through.
> >
> > -Eric
|