| To: | Murthy Kambhampaty <murthy.kambhampaty@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Does anyone even WANT a Fedora Core 1 that's XFS capable? |
| From: | Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:30:34 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <2D92FEBFD3BE1346A6C397223A8DD3FC092560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <2D92FEBFD3BE1346A6C397223A8DD3FC092560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 |
Murthy Kambhampaty wrote: Let's just see whether the FC2 beta installer supports XFS, and take if from there? BTW all of my linux systems have 4 primary partitions on the system disk with: [hs]da1 for boot, [hs]da2 for root, [hs]da3 for swap, [hs]da4 for VGsys, with /var, /tmp, /usr and /home on corresponding LVs in VGsys. For users like me, no LVM means no go. It should support xfs via "linux xfs". I used an older version of the FC2 installer as a base for my work and it supports it. I seem to have spoken too soon about the RAID support : I currently have a system installing and it's using a mix of RAID0, RAID1 and RAID5 (yes, for testing .. and on one disk only :)). If this indeed works then I'm sitting down and continuing on the LVM support. // Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Does anyone even WANT a Fedora Core 1 that's XFS capable?, Stefan Smietanowski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS internal error / xfs_force_shutdown, Dan Lake |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Does anyone even WANT a Fedora Core 1 that's XFS capable?, Axel Thimm |
| Next by Thread: | XFS internal error / xfs_force_shutdown, Dan Lake |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |