xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: List configuration

To: Arthur Corliss <corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: List configuration
From: "Net Llama!" <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:02:07 -0800
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401161412560.20635@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: HAL III
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401151607460.26076@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4007500D.1060806@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401161340400.16362@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0401161753240.6290@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401161351360.16362@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40086E9F.90602@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401161412560.20635@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031125
On 01/16/04 15:16, Arthur Corliss wrote:
that's not really the point.  Listen to me carefully, children:  treat the

The only child here is you. Throwing a tantrum because you dislike how a list is setup proves you to be the infantile fool. You've wasted significantly more bandwidth in your whining than the spam that you claim to be ruining your life. Get lost troll.
<PLONK>


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman                                    netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo:                    http://netllama.ipfox.com

 15:55:01  up 40 days, 20:40,  1 user,  load average: 0.05, 0.09, 0.08


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>