xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: List configuration

To: "Thomas (maillists)" <thomas-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: List configuration
From: Arthur Corliss <corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:46:26 -0900 (AKST)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <40087274.7000903@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401151607460.26076@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4007500D.1060806@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401161340400.16362@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0401161753240.6290@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401161351360.16362@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40086E9F.90602@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401161412560.20635@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40087274.7000903@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Thomas (maillists) wrote:

> Don't call others children once you know they are ...

LOL.  Okay, I really have no idea how to interpret this, so I'll concede you
the point (whatever it is ;-)

> Yeah, but the CAUSE is the SPAM, not the list. So if you want to treat
> the cause then you have to go against the
> spam-senders, not the list.

Based on the current protocols, that's pretty damned hard to do, given all the
work-arounds.  I'm working off of what I had thought the unwritten rule was
for all of us admins of public servers:  don't exacerbate the problem by
(re)transmitting spam ourselves.  If I ever catch one of my many users sending
spam, I'll terminate the account immediately.  In addition to that, I don't
run an open relay, nor do I run open lists.

Thank god for RBLs, otherwise I'd be paying for a hell of alot more bandwidth
(out of the ~200,000 attempts to connect to my server per month 47% are
rejected based on RBLs).

Now, what happens SGI ends up on an RBL because they refused to closed a hole
that spammers are using?

        --Arthur Corliss
          Bolverk's Lair -- http://arthur.corlissfamily.org/
          Digital Mages -- http://www.digitalmages.com/
          "Live Free or Die, the Only Way to Live" -- NH State Motto


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>