xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: List configuration

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: List configuration
From: "Thomas (maillists)" <thomas-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:23:32 +0100
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401161412560.20635@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401151607460.26076@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4007500D.1060806@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401161340400.16362@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0401161753240.6290@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401161351360.16362@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <40086E9F.90602@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401161412560.20635@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 MultiZilla/1.6.0.0b
Arthur Corliss wrote:


And I've got SGI white-listed because, for some reason, my patch updates for
IRIX were getting caught by some of SpamAssassin's checks.  The irony is
that's not really the point. Listen to me carefully, children:
Don't call others children once you know they are ...

 treat the
cause, not the symptom.  This would all be moot if SGI wasn't running an open
list.  It's that simple.

Yeah, but the CAUSE is the SPAM, not the list. So if you want to treat the cause then you have to go against the
spam-senders, not the list.


thomas


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>