| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: state of XFS capable linux installers |
| From: | Greg Freemyer <freemyer-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 07 Jan 2004 10:44:42 -0500 |
| Cc: | Arthur Corliss <corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Scott Fagg <scott.fagg@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401070937580.21503-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401070937580.21503-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | freemyer-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 10:39, Eric Sandeen wrote: > See ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/xfs_users.html > for a list of distros that have supported xfs for quite some > time now. > > -Eric That's an interesting list, but I know SUSE considered XFS experimental in the 8.0 release mentioned. I'm curious when the various releases started 'supporting' xfs. (Or whatever the right phrase is.) For instance, I don't know SUSE's current treatment of XFS. ie. Is it still experimental? I know I just upgraded a couple of SUSE 8.2 servers to 9.0 due to issues I believe were caused by xfs. Greg -- Greg Freemyer |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: state of XFS capable linux installers, Arthur Corliss |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS over 7.7TB LVM partition through NFS, Jirka Kosina |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: state of XFS capable linux installers, Arthur Corliss |
| Next by Thread: | Re: state of XFS capable linux installers, Scott Fagg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |