| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: state of XFS capable linux installers |
| From: | Arthur Corliss <corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 7 Jan 2004 06:50:15 -0900 (AKST) |
| Cc: | Scott Fagg <scott.fagg@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401070937580.21503-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401070937580.21503-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Eric Sandeen wrote: > The original poster made the common error of equating "Linux" > solely with "Red Hat," and Red Hat is indeed pretty much the last > distro that has no xfs support. > > See ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/xfs_users.html > for a list of distros that have supported xfs for quite some > time now. Had to change the protocol to HTTP, but I found it, thanks. Do you need to add my own homebrew kludge to the list? ;-) Wouldn't want to maintain *that* list. . . --Arthur Corliss Bolverk's Lair -- http://arthur.corlissfamily.org/ Digital Mages -- http://www.digitalmages.com/ "Live Free or Die, the Only Way to Live" -- NH State Motto |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Segfault of xfs_repair during repair of a xfs filesystem, Arthur Corliss |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: state of XFS capable linux installers, Greg Freemyer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: state of XFS capable linux installers, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: state of XFS capable linux installers, Greg Freemyer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |