| To: | hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: noatime |
| From: | AndyLiebman@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:44:40 EST |
| Cc: | ewwhite@xxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Thanks for clarifying. The aps that are accessing those drives don't need the atime information. So, it's goodbye with it. In a message dated 1/30/2004 12:58:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: There's no data-integrity issues, but there's certain applications that rely on atime information. [[HTML alternate version deleted]] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE 908648 - Fix gcc 3.5 compilation for real, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | KERNEL_PANIC null memory on KM_SLEEP request, Jose Morales-Wade |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: noatime, Ethan Benson |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE 908648 - Fix gcc 3.5 compilation for real, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |