| To: | Jarrod Johnson <jbj-ksylph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Strange df output |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 17 Jan 2004 09:17:30 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <40094F09.3000702@linux-sxs.org> |
| References: | <20040108154940.7dd28591.jbj-ksylph@ken-ohki> <1073595887.27384.260.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> <20040117091614.7d172889.jbj-ksylph@ken-ohki> <40094F09.3000702@linux-sxs.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 |
Net Llama! wrote:
On 01/17/04 06:16, Jarrod Johnson wrote: It is, xfs_check is going to be a memory hog, if your user space tools are as old as the filesystem is, try getting new ones, there were some changes which would reduce the amount of memory consumed by a factor of 2 at least. The other options are to run from single user so there is more memory available, and make sure you have swap configured. xfs_check is just going to report error conditions, xfs_repair is the program to fix them. Same comments apply as above. You can always get the mkfs parameters out of the filesystem by using xfs_info on the mounted fs. If it will not mount then you can dump the super block which contains the info: xfs_db -r /dev/xxx sb 0 p Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Strange df output, Net Llama! |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 304] New: memory requirements for xfs_check should be documented in the man page, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Strange df output, Net Llama! |
| Next by Thread: | Swapfiles broken on XFS., Nigel Cunningham |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |